m8ta
You are not authenticated, login.
text: sort by
tags: modified
type: chronology
{1238}
hide / / print
ref: -0 tags: histology immune response otto indiana electrodes gfap inflamation transparent clearing vimentin date: 04-19-2013 23:59 gmt revision:4 [3] [2] [1] [0] [head]

PMID-23428842 Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses.

  • Woolley AJ, Desai HA, Otto KJ.
  • One timepoint, 4 weeks.
  • Laser confocal microscopy
    • after tissue clearing (optical index of refraction matching) in a 60% sucrose solution.
  • Single-shank iridium contact silicon substrate MEA.
    • Device cut level with surface of brain after insertion.
  • Intact MEAs via device-capture histology, DHhist (Woolley et al 2011)
    • 350-450um tissue explanted with device.
    • They promote their technique.
  • Tissue surrounding microdevices exhibited two major depth-related phenomena:
    • a non-uniform microglial coating along the device length and
    • a dense mass of cells surrounding the implant in cerebral cortical layers I and II.
      • The dense mass of cells contained vimentin, a protein not typically expressed highly in CNS cells, evidence that non-CNS cells likely descended down the face of the penetrating devices from the pial surface.
        • But no Iba1 (activated microglia) per se in the tissue mass.
    • Hoe342 -- cell marker.
    • This mass was apparently consistent across animals!
    • Cells in the mass were VIM positive -- fibroblasts -- meninges?
  • low GFAP = not an astrocytic scar.
  • This study provides further evidence that a progressive invasion of non-CNS cells contributes substantially to the chronic phase of the tissue response around intracortical MEAs.
    • Again, might be from BBB distruption {1237}


This result is supported by previous papers:
  • {1193} -- microglia response not correlated to electrode failure, but correlated to ferritin immunoresponse
  • {781} -- also note that menigeal fibroblasts migrate down electrode tracts.
  • {1028} -- measured vimentin, GFAP, and ED1 (not Iba1). Found Vim+ and GFAP+, suggesting reactive astrocytes and not meningeal cells. ED1 aka CD68 is specific to macrophages and not microglia, so these may be blood-derived cells.
  • {1200} -- chronic contact with the meninges v.s intraparenchymal correlated with Vim+ encapsulation.
  • {1210} -- old paper showing the same result near surface of implant.
  • {1196} -- more against GFAP & pro BBB disruption
  • {1204} -- GFAP uncorrelated (!) with NeuN intensity
  • {307} -- all initial tests of utah arrays showed fibrous encapsulation; one array was completely explanted. This is why now they put gore-tex over the implant -- to prevent fibroblast migration (i guess).

{1200}
hide / / print
ref: Kim-2004.05 tags: histology electrode immune response Tresco hollow fiber membranes GFAP vimentin ED1 date: 01-28-2013 03:08 gmt revision:7 [6] [5] [4] [3] [2] [1] [head]

PMID-14741588[0] Chronic response of adult rat brain tissue to implants anchored to the skull.

  • The increase in tissue reactivity observed with transcranially implanted HFMs may be influenced by several mechanisms including chronic contact with the meninges and possibly motion of the device within brain tissue.
  • Broadly speaking, our results suggest that any biomaterial, biosensor or device that is anchored to the skull and in chronic contact with meningeal tissue will have a higher level of tissue reactivity than the same material completely implanted within brain tissue.
  • See also [1]
  • Could slice through the hollow fiber membrane for histology. (as we shall).
  • Good list of references.

____References____

[0] Kim YT, Hitchcock RW, Bridge MJ, Tresco PA, Chronic response of adult rat brain tissue to implants anchored to the skull.Biomaterials 25:12, 2229-37 (2004 May)
[1] Biran R, Martin DC, Tresco PA, The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.J Biomed Mater Res A 82:1, 169-78 (2007 Jul)