You are not authenticated, login.
text: sort by
tags: modified
type: chronology
hide / / print
ref: Du-2011.01 tags: Harrison recording electrode MEA Blanche date: 01-04-2013 02:43 gmt revision:3 [2] [1] [0] [head]

PMID-22022568[0] Multiplexed, High Density Electrophysiology with Nanofabricated Neural Probes

  • The number of single-units possible to record doubles every 7 years [5].
  • Electrodes must be within 100um of soma to relaibly detect extracellular action potentials.
  • Existing Michigan arrays have trace features around >=1 um; here they use E-beam lithography to decrease the probe width dramatically.
    • Their wire widths are 290 nm. Still bigger than 40nm process (?)
  • Seem to use Reid Harrison's ASIC RHA22132 design.
  • noise of electrodes progressively decreased with consecutive gold electroplating cycles. Plating makes the electrodes rough, and decreases their impedance to around 1 M.
    • Electrode contacts are around 10 x 10 um square, 108 um^2 area.
  • Intrinsic noise of the amplifier 1.7 uV RMS.
  • 290 nm wire had an impedance of 9.2 k -- corresponding to 1.0 uV rms noise.
  • able to record from the same neuron from several adjacent electrodes. Spacing ~ 28 um.
  • Detail their process extensively -- 40% of probes survived the process with <= 5 defective channels. THey propose further optimization to the e-beam lithography. Probes took 7 hours to pattern on the lithography machine (!).


[0] Du J, Blanche TJ, Harrison RR, Lester HA, Masmanidis SC, Multiplexed, high density electrophysiology with nanofabricated neural probes.PLoS One 6:10, e26204 (2011)

hide / / print
ref: Harrison-2003.06 tags: CMOS amplifier headstage electrophysiology neural_recording low_power chopper Reid Harrison date: 01-16-2012 04:43 gmt revision:12 [11] [10] [9] [8] [7] [6] [head]

IEEE-1201998 (pdf) A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications

  • detail novel MOS-bipolar pseudoresistor element to permit amplification of low-frequency signals down to milihertz range.
  • 80 microwatt spike amplifier in 0.16mm^2 silicon with 1.5 um CMOS, 1 microwatt EEG amplifier
  • input-referred noise of 2.2uV RMS.
  • has a nice graph comparing the power vs. noise for a number of other published designs
  • i doubt the low-frequency amplification really matters for neural recording, though certainly it matters for EEG.
    • they give an equation for the noise efficiency factor (NEF), as well as much detailed background.
    • NEF better than any prev. reported. Theoretical limit is 2.9 for this topology; they measure 4.8
  • does not compare well to Medtronic amp: http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005915
    • 2 microwatt! @ 1.8V
    • chopper-stabilized
    • not sure what they are going to use it for - the battery will be killed it it has to telemeter anything!
    • need to find the report for this.
  • tutorial on chopper-stabilized amplifiers -- they have nearly constant noise v.s. frequency, and very low input/output offset.
  • References: {1056} Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array. Nordhausen CT, Maynard EM, Normann RA.
  • [5] see {1041}
  • [9] {1042}
  • [12] {1043}

Harrison, R.R. and Charles, C. A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 38 6 958 - 965 (2003)

hide / / print
ref: Harrison-2009.08 tags: low power ASIC wireless neural recording Reid Harrison Shenoy date: 01-03-2012 00:55 gmt revision:2 [1] [0] [head]

IEEE-5061585 (pdf) Wireless Neural Recording With Single Low-Power Integrated Circuit

  • 100 channels, with threshold spike extraction.
  • 900Mhz FSK transmit coil.
  • Inductive power and data link.


Harrison, R.R. and Kier, R.J. and Chestek, C.A. and Gilja, V. and Nuyujukian, P. and Ryu, S. and Greger, B. and Solzbacher, F. and Shenoy, K.V. Wireless Neural Recording With Single Low-Power Integrated Circuit Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 17 4 322 -329 (2009)