You are not authenticated, login.
text: sort by
tags: modified
type: chronology
[0] Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R, Neural correlates of reach errors.J Neurosci 25:43, 9919-31 (2005 Oct 26)

hide / / print
ref: Diedrichsen-2005.1 tags: Shadmehr error learning basal ganglia cerebellum motor cortex date: 03-09-2009 19:26 gmt revision:0 [head]

PMID-16251440[0] Neural correlates of reach errors.

  • Abstract:
  • Reach errors may be broadly classified into errors arising from unpredictable changes in target location, called target errors, and errors arising from miscalibration of internal models (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback or a force field alters limb dynamics), called execution errors.
    • Execution errors may be caused by miscalibration of dynamics (e.g., when a force field alters limb dynamics) or by miscalibration of kinematics (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback).
  • Although all types of errors lead to similar on-line corrections, we found that the motor system showed strong trial-by-trial adaptation in response to random execution errors but not in response to random target errors.
  • We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a compatible robot to study brain regions involved in processing each kind of error.
  • Both kinematic and dynamic execution errors activated regions along the central and the postcentral sulci and in lobules V, VI, and VIII of the cerebellum, making these areas possible sites of plastic changes in internal models for reaching.
    • Only activity related to kinematic errors extended into parietal area 5.
    • These results are inconsistent with the idea that kinematics and dynamics of reaching are computed in separate neural entities.
  • In contrast, only target errors caused increased activity in the striatum and the posterior superior parietal lobule.
  • The cerebellum and motor cortex were as strongly activated as with execution errors. These findings indicate a neural and behavioral dissociation between errors that lead to switching of behavioral goals and errors that lead to adaptation of internal models of limb dynamics and kinematics.